AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD Radeon HD 6610M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 550 and AMD Radeon HD 6610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 3505.6x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2121 vs 565
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 vs 4 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s vs 10.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2121 vs 565 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6610M
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 466
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 466 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6610M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 550 | AMD Radeon HD 6610M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 527 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2121 | 565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 550 | AMD Radeon HD 6610M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Lexa | Whistler |
| Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 300 | 298 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 75.71 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
| Pixel fill rate | 18.93 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s | 10.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 26 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 716 million |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.00 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
