AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 550 and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 550
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 vs 370
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 vs 370 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4769 vs 2121
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 20 Apr 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 vs 2121 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 550 | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 370 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2121 | 4769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 550 | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Polaris 22 |
| Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 | 1 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 300 | 301 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 1011 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 75.71 GFLOPS (1:16) | 161.8 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS (1:1) | 2.588 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS | 2.588 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 18.93 GPixel/s | 32.35 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 5000 million |
| Compute performance | 20 | |
| Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.00 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 1024 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
