AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs ATI Radeon X300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and ATI Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 18 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 11733.3x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 1.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 110 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 36 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 257 vs 209
- 26.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1099 vs 41
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 1.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 36 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 vs 209 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1099 vs 41 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X300
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | ATI Radeon X300 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4927 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 | 209 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1099 | 41 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | ATI Radeon X300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Dragon Range | RV370 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 846 | 844 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 375 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 1.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 107 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 400 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | DDR |