AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 18 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 7.3x more boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4888.9x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 130 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 257 vs 205
- 10.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1099 vs 106
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 8 November 2004 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 vs 205 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1099 vs 106 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4927 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 | 205 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1099 | 106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | Dragon Range | NV41 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 8 November 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 846 | 843 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 300 MHz |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 12 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 222 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-III |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 300 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | 128 / 256 |
Shared memory | 0 |