AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 384
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 23 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 384 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 vs 6968 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- 7.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3438 vs 480
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3438 vs 480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 384 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 6968 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | 3438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
Code name | Phoenix | TU117 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 277 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |