AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1785 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 804
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 29 Oct 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1785 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 804 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62614 vs 27873
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12724 vs 7023
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5994 vs 2803
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62614 vs 27873 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12724 vs 7023 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5994 vs 2803 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27873 | 62614 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 804 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7023 | 12724 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2803 | 5994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
Code name | Phoenix | TU116 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 213 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 6600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 336.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |