AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 941 MHz
- 3x more boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 967 MHz
- 1285.3x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 108.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27793 vs 12758
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 279
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6998 vs 3496
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 12 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 967 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 108.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 vs 12758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 279 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 vs 3496 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1336 vs 480
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 vs 480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 12758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 279 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 3496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | 1336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Phoenix | GK104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 691 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 967 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 941 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 108.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 120.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |