AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 2815 MHz vs 1708 MHz
- 1465x more texture fill rate: 180.2 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 107 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 772
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48727 vs 32384
- Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 235 vs 156
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 18 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz vs 1708 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 772 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48727 vs 32384 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 235 vs 156 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 1024
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 9583
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 vs 9583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 772 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9583 | 9796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48727 | 32384 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 235 | 156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP106 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 18 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 388 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 360.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.53 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.765 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1152 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.08 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |