AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 2815 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 508.5x more texture fill rate: 180.2 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 107 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 3.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1024
- 2.8x more maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 812
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 9583
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 48727
- 9.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 vs 235
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 812 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 9583 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 48727 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 vs 235 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 937 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9583 | 18598 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48727 | 67670 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 235 | 2231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP102 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 219 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 360.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.53 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.765 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.08 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |