AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 2055 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 2635 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 337.3 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2190 MHz, 17.5 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 10 May 2022 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2055 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2635 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 337.3 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2190 MHz, 17.5 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000
- 3x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2048
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 176 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 914
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 17137
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2604 vs 1859
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 87479
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 176 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 914 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 17137 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 vs 1859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 87479 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 914 | 1026 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17137 | 19545 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1859 | 2604 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87479 | 121768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 23 | GA104 |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 | 12 Apr 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 106 | 108 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2635 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 2055 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 674.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.59 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.79 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 168.6 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 337.3 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 176 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 300 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2190 MHz, 17.5 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |