AMD Radeon RX 6700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1941 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2450 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 352.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 999
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Jun 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1941 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 352.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 999 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- 2.6x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2304
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 19185
- Around 57% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 2014
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 92669
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 19185 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 2014 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 92669 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 999 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19185 | 22253 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2014 | 3163 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92669 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
Launch date | 9 Jun 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 76 | 44 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1941 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 705.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 22.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.29 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 156.8 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 352.8 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |