AMD Radeon RX 6700 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1941 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 2450 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 352.8 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 66% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1063 vs 1047
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1941 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 352.8 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1063 vs 1047 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- 2.7x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2304
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23500 vs 19260
- Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14964 vs 11166
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137703 vs 92280
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23500 vs 19260 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14964 vs 11166 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137703 vs 92280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1063 | 1047 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19260 | 23500 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11166 | 14964 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92280 | 137703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
Launch date | 9 Jun 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 57 | 59 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2450 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1941 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 705.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 22.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.29 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 156.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 352.8 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 290 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |