AMD Radeon RX 6700S vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700S and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700S
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 481.1x more texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1700 MHz
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 7 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1700 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1792
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 919 vs 738
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 vs 15035
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 vs 64074
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3565 vs 1451
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 919 vs 738 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 vs 15035 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 vs 64074 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3565 vs 1451 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700S
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700S | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 738 | 919 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15035 | 19673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64074 | 155548 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1451 | 3565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700S | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Volta |
Code name | Navi 23 | GV100 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 158 | 157 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 448.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.168 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 128.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |