AMD Radeon RX 6700S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700S
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15035 vs 14119
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1451 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15035 vs 14119 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1451 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1792
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 738
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 64074
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 1792 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 738 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 64074 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700S
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 738 | 746 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15035 | 14119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64074 | 71402 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1451 | 1242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 158 | 161 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 448.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.168 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 128.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |