AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 65% higher core clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• 1288.7x more texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1430 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 961 vs 836
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20770 vs 15149
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107133 vs 89068
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 359.653 vs 355.937
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7156.733 vs 4858.771
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.495 vs 25.191

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 vs 118.072
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1056.078 vs 866.201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	961 836
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20770 15149
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	107133 89068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	359.653 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7156.733 4858.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.495 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.072 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	866.201 1056.078

Compare specifications (specs)