AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 1165.3x more texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 9% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 11 GB
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82468 vs 67670
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 11 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82468 vs 67670 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 641
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 17406
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 641 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 17406 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 937 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17406 | 18598 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82468 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 22 | GP102 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 89 | 219 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |