AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17883 vs 12225
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.776 vs 25.421
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.081 vs 734.936
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.568 vs 2.31
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.789 vs 35.434
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6020 vs 5683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3571
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6020 vs 5683
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3571
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 23 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17883 vs 12225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 vs 25.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 vs 734.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 vs 2.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 vs 35.434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 vs 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 vs 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 274 Watt
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17883 | 12225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | 25.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | 734.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | 2.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 | 35.434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3336 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 700 | 701 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 720 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3540 Million |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 243.8 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |