AMD FirePro D700 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D700 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25177 vs 22410
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 51.181
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 1121.002
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 5.355
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 81.527
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6051 vs 5094
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3692
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6051 vs 5094
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3692
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 24 April 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25177 vs 22410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 vs 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 vs 1121.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 vs 5.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 vs 81.527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 vs 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 vs 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 274 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D700 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25177 | 22410 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | 51.181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | 1121.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | 5.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | 81.527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3339 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3529 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 506 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D700 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Wimbledon |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 564 | 590 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 279 mm | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |