AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD FirePro D700
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385X and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49760 vs 25177
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 vs 25177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 896
- Around 77% better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6051 vs 4079
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6051 vs 4079
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 vs 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 vs 4079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385X | AMD FirePro D700 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4079 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4079 | 6051 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1994 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 | 25177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M385X | AMD FirePro D700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Strato | Tahiti |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 563 | 564 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 4,313 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 263.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5480 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M385X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
AMDFirePro D700
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
