AMD FirePro D700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D700 and NVIDIA Quadro 5010M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- 5x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25202 vs 16261
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25202 vs 16261 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 274 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25202 | 16261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1772 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D700 | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | GF110 |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 564 | 568 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $235.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 279 mm | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 263.0 GB / s | 83.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5480 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |