AMD FirePro M4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.162 vs 67.697
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3325
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 22 August 2012 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 vs 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 670 MHz
- 5.3x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 4x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 vs 15.905
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 432.116
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 vs 1.48
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 vs 24.029
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 vs 3591
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 vs 3591
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 670 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 vs 15.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 vs 432.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 vs 1.48 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 vs 24.029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 vs 3591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 vs 3591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1059 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | 32.718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | 1021.371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | 3.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | 56.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 | 67.697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 | 3665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Mars | GK104 |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 22 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 809 | 811 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
