Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD FirePro M4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1530 vs 1059
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 16 October 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1530 vs 1059 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 670 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 562
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5067 vs 4536
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3591 vs 958
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3591 vs 958
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2304
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 vs 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5067 vs 4536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD FirePro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1530 | 1059 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2475 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2475 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4536 | 5067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 958 | 3591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 958 | 3591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Mars |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 16 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 808 | 809 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 514.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s | 16.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
