Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD FirePro M4100

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and AMD FirePro M4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • 3.4x more texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
  • Around 72% better floating-point performance: 883.2 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1530 vs 1059
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 September 2014 vs 16 October 2013
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1530 vs 1059

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 670 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 562
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5067 vs 4536
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3591 vs 958
  • 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3591 vs 958
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2304
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2304
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 670 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 623 vs 562
Geekbench - OpenCL 5067 vs 4536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3591 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3591 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 2304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1530
1059
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
562
623
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4536
5067
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3591
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
958
3591
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2304
3361
Name Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 AMD FirePro M4100
PassMark - G3D Mark 1530 1059
PassMark - G2D Mark 562 623
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2475
Geekbench - OpenCL 4536 5067
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 958 3591
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 958 3591
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2304 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2304 3361
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 432.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.48
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.029
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 74.162

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 AMD FirePro M4100

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Broadwell GT3e Mars
Launch date 5 September 2014 16 October 2013
Place in performance rating 808 809
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 670 MHz
Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 514.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Texture fill rate 55.2 GTexel / s 16.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
AppAcceleration