AMD FirePro M4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 666.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 465
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.162 vs 51.009
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3242
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 670 MHz
• 3.9x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 16.08 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1059
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 5067
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 vs 15.905
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 432.116
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.48
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 24.029
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3591
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3591

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1059 3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5067 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.905 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	432.116 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.48 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.029 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.162 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3591 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3591 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3242

Compare specifications (specs)