AMD FirePro R5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro R5000 and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 39.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 768 vs 96
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 1,267 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 365
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2647 vs 571
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 February 2013 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 vs 365 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2647 vs 571 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 350 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro R5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro R5000 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 | 365 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2647 | 571 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8743 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro R5000 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Pitcairn | GF108 |
Launch date | 25 February 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,099 | |
Place in performance rating | 402 | 602 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $275.14 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 39.6 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 279 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |