NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs AMD FirePro R5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 2647
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3342
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3342
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 25 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 2647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 625 vs 444
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3654
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3654
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 vs 444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3654 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD FirePro R5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 | 2647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 625 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3671 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD FirePro R5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 25 February 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | $1,099 |
Place in performance rating | 406 | 408 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 825 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |