AMD Radeon 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 864.5x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 202 vs 172
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 6327
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 28 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 vs 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 6327 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 660 GFLOPs
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1518 vs 862
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 vs 1182
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 vs 1182
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 1242
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 660 GFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1518 vs 862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 862 | 1518 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 | 6327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 520 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Oland | GM108 |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 28 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1104 | 1105 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 993 MHz |
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | 762.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 20 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |