AMD Radeon 530 vs AMD Radeon R5 M420
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and AMD Radeon R5 M420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 1437.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 547.2 gflops
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1021 vs 487
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 154
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 vs 972
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3165
- 122.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 vs 16.5
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3165
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs vs 547.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1021 vs 487 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 vs 972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 vs 16.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3165 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M420
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14165 vs 5008
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2979 vs 2246
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2979 vs 2246
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14165 vs 5008 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2979 vs 2246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2979 vs 2246 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 530 | AMD Radeon R5 M420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1021 | 487 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5008 | 14165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 2979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 16.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 2979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3165 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530 | AMD Radeon R5 M420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Jet |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1120 | 1122 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 850 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 780 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 547.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 20/24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |