AMD Radeon 530 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 960.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 6 July 2016
Core clock speed 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
  • Around 2% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs
  • Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7719 vs 5008
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 2021
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 2246
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 2021
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 2246
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 512 vs 384
Floating-point performance 819.2 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 7719 vs 5008
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2072 vs 2021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3122 vs 2246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2072 vs 2021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3122 vs 2246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5008
7719
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2021
2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2246
3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2021
2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2246
3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3358
Name AMD Radeon 530 AMD Radeon R7 350
PassMark - G3D Mark 1021
PassMark - G2D Mark 175
Geekbench - OpenCL 5008 7719
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2021 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2246 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2021 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2246 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 647.813
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 109.558

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 530 AMD Radeon R7 350

Essentials

Architecture GCN GCN 1.0
Code name Meso Cape Verde
Design Radeon 500 Series
GCN generation 3rd Gen
Launch date 18 April 2017 6 July 2016
Place in performance rating 1120 1121
Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 1024 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 800 GFLOPs 819.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 512
Pixel fill rate 8.20 GP/s
Render output units 8
Stream Processors 320/384
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 25.6 GTexel / s
Texture Units 20/24
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 55 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 168 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 4500 MHz
Memory type DDR3/GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)