AMD Radeon 530 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA Quadro M500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 1367.1x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2246 vs 1729
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3122
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2246 vs 1729
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 27 April 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 vs 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 vs 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3122 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 1028
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 175
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6069 vs 5020
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2174 vs 2021
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2174 vs 2021
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 vs 1028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 175 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6069 vs 5020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 vs 2021 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1028 | 1163 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 180 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5020 | 6069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3122 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Meso | GM108 |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 27 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1094 | 1096 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 530 with others
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9700
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5500
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIFireMV 2200 PCI
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX
