AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M5950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 1413.8x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6339 vs 1179
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2343 vs 1528
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2343 vs 1528
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6339 vs 1179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 vs 1528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 vs 1528 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 193
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1314 vs 1071
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 2405
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 2405
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 vs 193 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1314 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 vs 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 vs 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD FirePro M5950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 574 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1071 | 1314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6339 | 1179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 1528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 1528 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 323.699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.137 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.638 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD FirePro M5950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Topaz | Whistler |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 992 | 995 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 57 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |