AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 1668
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 189
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1994 vs 1062
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8904 vs 6174
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 2343
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 2343
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 189 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1994 vs 1062 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8904 vs 6174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 361 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1062 | 1994 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6174 | 8904 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | Skylake GT4e |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1004 | 1007 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 72 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 834 M | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 535 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4600
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 4200 Go
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX230
