AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 1157.6x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6124 vs 3053
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3328
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 7 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6124 vs 3053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 192
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1646 vs 1076
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 2343
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 2343
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 2405
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 2405
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 192 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1646 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 vs 2405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 vs 2405 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 | 441 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1076 | 1646 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6124 | 3053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3328 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Topaz | GP107 |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 998 | 999 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 3,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 32.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |