AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 831.1x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 1623
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 1623
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 vs 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 vs 1623 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 784.1 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 193
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1807 vs 1078
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8200 vs 6085
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2343
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2343
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 784.1 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 193 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1807 vs 1078 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8200 vs 6085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2801 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2801 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 412 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1078 | 1807 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6085 | 8200 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 2801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 1623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3360 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.479 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | Tropo |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 986 | 1003 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 834 M | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 535 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile vs
IntelArc A350M
