AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 525 MHz
  • 11714.3x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
  • 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
  • 18.7x better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 42 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
  • 5.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1062 vs 114
  • 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 426
  • 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 426
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 28 June 2007
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 525 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 40
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops vs 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1062 vs 114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 426

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 346 vs 189
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 346 vs 189

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
346
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1062
114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
426
Name AMD Radeon 535 Mobile ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 346
PassMark - G3D Mark 1062 114
Geekbench - OpenCL 6091
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 426

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 535 Mobile ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 TeraScale
Code name Topaz RV610
Design Radeon 500 Series
Launch date 18 April 2017 28 June 2007
Place in performance rating 982 980
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 525 MHz
Floating-point performance 784.1 gflops 42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 384 40
Pixel fill rate 8.20 GP/s
Render output units 8
Stream Processors 384
Texture fill rate 24.60 GTexel/s 2.1 GTexel / s
Texture Units 24
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 834 M 180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 48 GB/s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR2

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support