AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 1280.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 66 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1564
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1564
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 731
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 19 April 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 66 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 731 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 694
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1116
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 205
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 vs 205 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3348 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 243 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1877 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Turks |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 19 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1255 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Price now | $102.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 800 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |