AMD Radeon 620 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and ATI Mobility FireGL V3200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 2.6x more boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 15362.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
  • 96x more pipelines: 384 vs 4
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
  • Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
  • 14.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 62
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 1 June 2004
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
Boost clock speed 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 130 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 vs 62

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 205
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 238 vs 205

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
238
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
62
Name AMD Radeon 620 ATI Mobility FireGL V3200
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 238
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 62

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 ATI Mobility FireGL V3200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Rage 9
Code name Polaris 24 M24
Launch date 13 May 2019 1 June 2004
Place in performance rating 1248 732
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz 400 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 130 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 4
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 1.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 75 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 9.0b
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.0
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 500 MHz
Memory type DDR3 128
Shared memory 0

Technologies

PCIe