AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon 620

NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 38% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 530 MHz
1932.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
5.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 38
3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 278

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 29 July 2008
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 530 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 12.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 48
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 60 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	205 vs 38
PassMark - G3D Mark	897 vs 278

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3297 vs 1116
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3297 vs 1116

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3297 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3297 vs 1116

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1116

3297

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1116

3297

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

205

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

897

278

Name	AMD Radeon 620	NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1116	3297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1116	3297
PassMark - G2D Mark	205	38
PassMark - G3D Mark	897	278

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 620	NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Tesla
Code name	Polaris 24	G94
Launch date	13 May 2019	29 July 2008
Place in performance rating	1248	1449
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	48
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	12.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	1550 million	505 million
CUDA cores		48
Floating-point performance		127.2 gflops
Gigaflops		180
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	10.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
PureVideo HD