AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 497.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 49.41 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 244 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 6 June 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 49.41 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 244 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 772 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.212 vs 18.876
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 914.386 vs 322.556
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.262 vs 1.478
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.391 vs 32.22
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.735 vs 70.423
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 772 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 vs 18.876 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 vs 322.556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 vs 1.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 vs 32.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 vs 70.423 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1074 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 42.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 914.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 5.262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 43.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 99.735 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GF110 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 6 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1144 | 1147 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 772 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 49.41 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 244 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,581 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 192.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |