AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 760M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 760M
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1117 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 554
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1117 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 vs 554 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 129.0 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10743 vs 5648
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61795 vs 20395
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 129.0 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10743 vs 5648 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61795 vs 20395 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | 554 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5648 | 10743 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20395 | 61795 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Phoenix | GA107S |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | |
| Place in performance rating | 165 | 164 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1117 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 77.38 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 129.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 25390 million | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 129.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.253 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.253 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

