AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 760M and NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 760M
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 87% higher boost clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 492
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 vs 492 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 276.0 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s
- 15.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 384
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7141 vs 5648
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 4 Jan 2023 |
Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7141 vs 5648 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | 492 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5648 | 7141 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20395 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Phoenix | GA104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 165 | 185 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 120.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 276.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 552.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |