AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 MXM and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- 3x more texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 2,150 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 MXM | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37782 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Baffin | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 13 September 2016 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 361 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 5,443 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |