AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 MXM and AMD Radeon E9550 MXM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 1090 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 1090 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops vs 2,150 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 MXM | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 27 September 2016 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 516 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 5,834 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 95 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |