AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and AMD FirePro S9300 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 31 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9300 X2
- 38.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 57.6 GTexel / s
- 9.1x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 896
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 6,963 gflops vs 2,150 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB
Texture fill rate | 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 57.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 6,963 gflops vs 2,150 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9300 X2
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | AMD FirePro S9300 X2 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27971 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | AMD FirePro S9300 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 31 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 823 | 824 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 2x 6,963 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2x 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 8,900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 2x 512.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM |