AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 2344
Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 2344

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 27 September 2016
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 2344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 2344

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
Around 72% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 30.848
Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 438.581
Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.268
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 46.988
Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 139.235
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 3241
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 3241

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1090 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate	57.6 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	896 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	44.281 vs 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	785.276 vs 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.951 vs 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	65.944 vs 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	196.307 vs 139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5269 vs 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5269 vs 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.848

44.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

438.581

785.276

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.268

3.951

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.988

65.944

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

139.235

196.307

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

5269

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

2344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

5269

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

2344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3357

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832
PassMark - G2D Mark	402
Geekbench - OpenCL	10229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848	44.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581	785.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268	3.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988	65.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235	196.307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241	5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709	2344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241	5269
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709	2344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3357

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Code name	Lexa	Baffin
Launch date	12 June 2017	27 September 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	804	816
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	1090 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	896
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	57.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s	112.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5