AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 875 MHz
- 26x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
- 14.4x more pipelines: 2304 vs 160
- 20.8x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops vs 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
Name | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 277 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Caicos |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 501 | 833 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | 280.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 18 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |