AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 96x more pipelines: 2304 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 9 January 2008 |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
Name | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 104 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
Code name | Ellesmere | MCP79Mx + NB9M |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 9 January 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 501 | 504 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 |