AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more pipelines: 2304 vs 320
- 13.5x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops vs 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Name | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 353 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Ellesmere | M96 |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 503 | 500 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |