AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 137.5 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- 1190.6x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36624 vs 33724
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 112.64 vs 111.543
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3597 vs 2443
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3208 vs 1674
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3597 vs 2443
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3208 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 4 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 926 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 137.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 vs 33724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 vs 111.543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1474.586
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 96.618
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 507.291
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 6622
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 6622
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1474.586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 9.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 96.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 507.291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 6622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 6622 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 | 33724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 | 111.543 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 | 1817.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 | 9.511 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 | 99.875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 | 511.362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6622 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3208 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6622 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3208 | 1674 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 835 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | Ellesmere |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 4 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 503 | 504 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops | 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 137.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Laptop size | large | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 211 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon E9550 MXM with others
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM vs
ATIFireGL V3300
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
