AMD Radeon HD 6230 vs AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6230 and AMD Radeon HD 6630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 26 Watt
Launch date | 2 July 2011 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 26 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6630M
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 480 vs 80
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 179
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 254
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 424 vs 252
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 424 vs 252
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1055 vs 744
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1055 vs 744
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2368 vs 1293
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2368 vs 1293
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 vs 179 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 424 vs 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 424 vs 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2368 vs 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2368 vs 1293 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6230 | AMD Radeon HD 6630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 179 | 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 252 | 424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 252 | 424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 744 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 744 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1293 | 2368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1293 | 2368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.549 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.527 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.818 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6230 | AMD Radeon HD 6630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Park | Whistler |
Launch date | 2 July 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1372 | 1374 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 26 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |