NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs AMD Radeon HD 6230
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and AMD Radeon HD 6230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 179
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 vs 252
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 744
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1293
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 vs 252
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 744
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1293
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 2 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 104 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 vs 179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 vs 252 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 vs 744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 vs 252 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 vs 744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1293 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6230
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 152
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 152 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 | 179 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 254 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | 252 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | 744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | 252 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | 744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF108 | Park |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 2 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1391 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 104 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 80 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 292 million |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDFirePro M8900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
